Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คลินิกเสริมความงามยกกระชับปรับรูปหน้า (Ren Clinic Beauty and Aesthetic Clinic Phuket) vs Candice Facial Spa
Independent side-by-side analysis from public Google review data.
Trust Score
Quick stats
Google rating★ 4.9vs★ 4.9
Total reviews130vs1,561✓
District—vsChang Khlan
Quality trend→ Stablevs→ Stable
Local Guide reviews15vs34✓
Avg reviewer credibility12vs27✓
StatusOpenvsOpen
Phone✓ listedvs✓ listed
Service strength (mention count)
Facial
584
HIFU
130
Botox
50
Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คล Candice Facial Spa
Reviewer languages
Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คลินิกเสริมความงามยกกระชับปรับรูปหน้า (Ren Clinic Beauty and Aesthetic Clinic Phuket)
EN100%
Candice Facial Spa
EN100%
Top mentioned doctor
Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คลินิกเสริมความงามยกกระชับปรับรูปหน้า (Ren Clinic Beauty and Aesthetic Clinic Phuket)
Pan
5 mentions·★ 5.0
Candice Facial Spa
No doctor-specific data.
What reviewers say
Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คลินิกเสริมความงามยกกระชับปรับรูปหน้า (Ren Clinic Beauty and Aesthetic Clinic Phuket)
Clean facility×30Recommended×27Friendly staff×13Professional×4Genuine brand×2English-speaking staff×1
Candice Facial Spa
Clean facility×38Recommended×31Professional×16Friendly staff×11Satisfied results×5Affordable×1
Sample reviews
Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คลินิกเสริมความงามยกกระชับปรับรูปหน้า (Ren Clinic Beauty and Aesthetic Clinic Phuket)
“Came to get a ultraformer iii done, the staff and drs are very informative, lovely and welcoming. Did not try to upsell me anything. They listened to my concerns and came up with a plan that was suite...”
Candice Facial Spa
“One of the best massages I have had in years. I had the Thai massage with therapist Benz and she was excellent. She was very knowledgeable and helped work out issues I had in my legs. I live in Chiang...”
Ren Clinic ภูเก็ต คลินิกเสริมความงามยกกระชับปรับรูปหน้า (Ren Clinic Beauty and Aesthetic Clinic Phuket)
Candice Facial Spa
↗ This is an independent comparison — neither clinic has paid for placement here.
📊 Data sources: Google reviews (Google Maps), Trust Score = our internal algorithm weighing review credibility, recency, language diversity, and Local Guide signals.